Pagos Basados en Acciones
En esta sección se presentan diversos estudios relacionados con los múltiples temas que se desprenden del tratamiento que las Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera (IFRS por su sigla en inglés) le otorgan a los “Pagos Basados en Acciones”. La presentación de los estudios se estructura en dos categorías. La primera comprende trabajos realizados por Observatorio IFRS, mientras que la segunda categoría se centra en proporcionar bibliografía de interés.
|
Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad e Información Financiera e Interpretaciones que regulan esta área de información: |
||
| IFRS 2 | : | Pagos Basados en Acciones |
Referencias bibliográficas de interés:
CÓDIGO: BPBA - 001
Ammann, M. y Seiz, R. (2005). An IFRS 2 and FASB 123 (R) Compatible Model for the Valuation of Employee Stock Options. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management. Volumen 19, Number 4, 381-396.
Abstract
In this paper, we show how employee stock options can be valued under the new reporting standards IFRS 2 and FASB 123 (revised) for share-based payments. Both standards require companies to expense employee stock options at fair value. We propose a new valuation model, referred to as Enhanced American model, that complies with the new standards and produces fair values often lower than those generated by traditional models such as the Black–Scholes model or the adjusted Black–Scholes model. We also provide a sensitivity analysis of model input parameters and analyze the impact of the parameters on the fair value of the option. The valuation of employee stock options requires an accurate estimation of the exercise behavior. We show how the exercise behavior can be modeled in a binomial tree and demonstrate the relevance of the input parameters in the calibration of the model to an estimated expected life of the option.
Disponible en:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/ynm870p38rj57226/
CÓDIGO: BPBA - 002
Chalmers, K. y Godfrey, J. (2005). Expensing stock-based payments: A material concern?. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. Volumen 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 157–173.
Abstract
Using SFAS 123 disclosures, Botosan and Plumlee [Botosan, C., & Plumlee, M. (2001). Stock option expense: The sword of Damocles Revealed. Accounting Horizons, 15, 311–327] find that if stock-based compensation were to be expensed rather than not recognised on the face of financial statements, the impact on key measures used to assess the performance of the fastest growing US firms would be material. Street and Cereola [Street, D. L., & Cereola, S. (2004). Stock option compensation: impact of expense recognition on performance indicators of non-domestic companies listed in the U.S. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 13, 21–37] subsequently also use SFAS 123 disclosures to determine that the average impact of expensing stock-based compensation on diluted EPS for non-US domiciled firms listed on US exchanges will be material and approximately 40%. In this paper, we examine whether these findings apply across international borders to firms that are required from 2005 to adopt IFRS 2 Share-Based Payment to expense stock-based payments, and across a broad range of industries and firms’ growth phases. Based on Australian Stock Exchange-listed firms’ 2002 stock-based compensation disclosures of the value of options granted to directors and the top 5 executives, the expensing of options will have a significant negative effect on approximately 20% of our sample firms’ financial performance ratios. It appears that the materiality of the impact is neither industry specific nor restricted to high growth firms. As the IFRS 2 expensing requirement extends to stock-based compensation issued to all employees, our findings are conservative estimates of the impact. The findings suggest that a stock-based compensation accounting policy change will affect recognised financial numbers and could have consequential ramifications for contractual specifications and valuations of firms across a range of industries and growth phases. Our sample of Australian firms provides an interesting context for the study, since these firms have neither traditionally expensed nor necessarily disclosed stock-based payments but from 2005, all stock-exchange listed Australian firms will be at the forefront of IFRS 2 adoption.
Disponible en:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1061951805000200
CÓDIGO: BPBA - 003
Elena Merino Madrid, Regino Banegas Ochovo y Jesús Fernando Santos Peñalver. (2010). Tratamiento contable de las stock options según la normativa contable internacional. Contaduría y administración. N° 230, pp. 105-129.
Abstract
La retribución que hacen las empresas a sus directivos y empleados mediante la entrega de opciones sobre acciones (stock options) se ha convertido en una práctica habitual en muchos países del mundo. Hasta fechas recientes no existía un consenso sobre el tratamiento contable que se debía dar a este tipo de transacciones; sin embargo, en la actualidad parece que tal consenso se ha alcanzado al exigir tanto el International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) como el Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), en la International Financial Reporting Standard, IFRS 2 (NIIF 2, Norma Internacional de Información Financiera) y Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123 (R) respectivamente, que se reconozca la remuneración basada en la entrega de opciones sobre acciones como un gasto en los estados financieros. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el tratamiento contable aplicable de acuerdo con la normativa contable internacional o de información financiera (NIC/NIIF).
Disponible en:
http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0186-10422010000100006&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt